A few things to say. First, recommendation from Another Matt:
* Hyperion by Dan Simmons
* The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett
* The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco
Second, I have decided to put Guns, Germs and Steel back on the shelf for a bit. While I am enjoying it a lot more now, it's just taking me way too long, and as a result the blog is lying fallow. Since Rule #1 of having a blog is: Post, stupid, I feel like I need to get going on some other books in the meantime. I do fully intend to come back to Guns... in the not-too-distant, but right now I need something a bit more portable (much of my reading time occurs on buses and in random stolen moments). I'm awaiting directions from J, and will let you know when she has assigned me something new.
In the meantime, here's what I would say about Guns...: it's an important book, and more people should read it. There's a lot of great information in it that sheds light on human development around the world, and Diamond goes a long way toward his goal of beating the crap out of those my-people-won-because-we're-just-better arguments. But the problem is that the book is pitched too high: the people who are able to get through it (and I don't just mean people who are able to comprehend the information, but people who would are devoted enough to read the entire thing) are almost certainly going to be the people who already agree with him and are looking to back up their own arguments. Which isn't to suggest that the book is wasted, because Guns... is, as far as I know, the first book to collect all of the data and present it in one place, and that makes it very useful indeed. But it's hard going, and I can't pretend otherwise.
So my verdict (for now) on Guns, Germs and Steel is this: Read it, by all means - it's certainly worth the effort - but expect to have to put some work in. I would also advocate dipping into it over an extended period rather than trying to do it as I have. It's too much information to take in all at once, for me at least, and trying to cram it all in over a short time just means that I'd have ended up missing important pieces of the puzzle.
XOXO
No comments:
Post a Comment